The manufacturing industry has been slow to adopt new technologies, often relying on proprietary point-to-point integration systems and maintaining a culture of stagnation. However, the advent of generative AI is transforming smart manufacturing, providing a new paradigm by highlighting the critical role open source software and communities play in optimizing production lines, reducing waste, and improving supply chain logistics. In this article, we will explore how generative AI is transforming smart manufacturing, including its potential benefits, drawbacks, and recommendations for companies interested in adopting this technology.
Generative AI refers to artificial intelligence models that can generate new, previously unseen content based on learned patterns and data. These models can autonomously create text, images, music, and other types of content, enabling a wide range of applications. Before the launch of ChatGPT, generative AI was primarily used in fields such as content creation, data augmentation, and anomaly detection.
The launch of ChatGPT marked a turning point in the field of generative AI, enabling companies and individuals worldwide to leverage the technology in a variety of applications. For instance, in customer service, ChatGPT has replaced static chatbots that often provided limited and unhelpful responses. Unlike these chatbots, generative AI models like ChatGPT can understand context, adapt to the conversation, and provide more accurate and relevant information. This has led to a significant improvement in user experience and customer satisfaction.
Another notable success story is the application of generative AI in research and development. ChatGPT has been used to aid scientists and engineers in generating hypotheses, designing experiments, and even writing scientific papers. By processing vast amounts of data and identifying patterns, generative AI can provide insights that may otherwise be missed by human researchers, accelerating innovation and discovery.
The Importance of Open-Source Software and Communities
The proprietary/owned code approach will pan out for a while so long as there’s good money to be made in the intellectual property (IP). There are currently lots of niches where only a few players dominate, which has inevitably led to incredibly entrenched IP practices. These practices go beyond software — hardware manufacturers are notorious for adding components that render the product useless unless it is being used in conjunction with products from the same vendor in the same family line of solutions.
The good news is that the death of proprietary software and predatory IP practices has already begun. The advent of generative AI has further accelerated the death timeline. In a pathetically futile and disappointing attempt, the last breath of a dying breed of hardware and software solution stacks will not go in peace but suffer a very very very very very slow and painful death.
One of the key advantages of generative AI is the ability to leverage open-source software and communities to quickly learn the platform and continuously improve it. We call these force multipliers, where 1 hour or 1 week’s worth of effort now is equivalent to 1 month of work when supplemented by generative AI. The interconnected nature of successful digital transformation journeys is not possible if hardware and software are locked down with slow and ineffective proprietary technology. Open-source software and hardware enable companies to collaborate with other organizations, share resources and data, and create a more robust platform that can adapt to changing business needs.
Open-source software also fosters a culture of innovation, enabling developers to build on each other’s work and create new applications that can benefit the entire industry. This approach enables companies to avoid vendor lock-in and ensures that they have access to the latest technology and best practices.
Regardless of whether they consciously acknowledge it, scalability, flexibility, resiliency, and rapid development are the top priorities of manufacturers. The fundamental constant nature of manufacturing is change. Nowhere is this embodied more deeply than with the design of experiments. This basic exploration and application of the scientific process is taught to engineers and scientists everywhere and to deviate from this is sheer hypocrisy.
Potential Drawbacks
Implementing generative AI in manufacturing can require significant upfront investment in hardware, software, and personnel. Companies may need to invest in high-performance computing infrastructure, data storage, and analytics software to support the technology. Additionally, there is a risk of data breaches, as generative AI relies on large volumes of data to learn and improve. It does not take much to instill FUD through news like the CapitalOne and AWS data leak.
What continues to be missing from these articles is scientific due-diligence into the root cause of the incident as well as explanation of the scientific principles at play. Cybersecurity is another area of investment but the cost will primarily be in redefining attitudes around the Purdue model, as well as reducing the decision making weight security staff have to a small minority instead of the current majority.
Security is always a risk but the gravity of the consequences as well as root cause analysis of such events empirically continues to show that misconfiguration and mismanagement are what led to such breaches. Furthermore, in more severe incidents, breaches and leaks have been shown to be caused by expert coordinated government-sponsored attacks often co-opting corrupt ex-employees and negligent systems integrators overpromising a faulty bill of goods.
Another potential drawback of generative AI is the potential for job displacement. While the new line of workers will simply be required to have a stronger computational/analytical background and their daily responsibilities will merely be supervising the generative AI do its work, companies need to ensure that they have a plan in place to retrain or relocate workers whose jobs may be affected by the technology. One area of interest is in how generative AI is actually helping people overcome learning curves, especially for disenfranchised populations like those recently released from incarceration.
Recommendations For Companies Interested In Adopting Generative AI
Companies interested in adopting generative AI for their manufacturing processes should follow a few key recommendations to ensure success. First, they need to select the right partnerships. This means working with systems integrators who will help propose open architectural designs that are not exclusively or primarily beholden to a vendor and will openly disclose if they do have pre-existing sponsorships to shill/lead with particular vendor solution stacks. Additionally, depending on your needs, significant investment in on-premise hardware may be required to support the software technology. This may require significant investment in high-performance computing infrastructure, data storage, and analytics software.
Second, they need to build a strong team that includes data scientists, software developers, and domain experts who understand the manufacturing processes. This team should work collaboratively to develop a comprehensive implementation plan that considers the specific needs of the organization.
Third, companies should adhere to the four principles of digital transformation: report by exception, open architecture, lightweight, edge-driven. This means that they should only report exceptions rather than every detail, use open architecture to enable collaboration, keep the system lightweight to optimize performance, and use edge-driven processing to enable real-time decision-making.
Fourth, companies should become data companies, which means that they should prioritize collecting, managing, and analyzing data to improve their operations. This may require a shift in the company culture, as well as investment in data analytics tools and training.
Fifth, companies should work collaboratively with vendors and competitors to share resources, data, and best practices. This can help accelerate the adoption of generative AI in the industry and create a more robust platform for all organizations.
Finally, companies should adhere to shared prosocial values, such as ethical data use and privacy, fairness, transparency, and sustainability. This can help ensure that generative AI is used for the greater good and benefits society.
Generative AI can analyze data from sensors and other sources to identify patterns that indicate potential equipment failure. By predicting and addressing issues before they escalate, manufacturers can minimize downtime, reduce maintenance costs, and improve overall efficiency. Generative AI can be used to forecast demand, manage inventory, and optimize logistics. By analyzing historical data and real-time information, generative AI can help manufacturers make data-driven decisions that lead to more efficient and resilient supply chains.
AI-powered generative design tools can automatically generate multiple design alternatives based on specific constraints and objectives. Engineers can then evaluate these alternatives and choose the optimal solution. This approach not only accelerates the design process but also enables the discovery of innovative, high-performance designs that might have been overlooked through traditional methods.
Generative AI can be utilized to create adaptive training programs and provide real-time support to employees. By analyzing individual performance data, generative AI can tailor training content to the specific needs of each worker, improving knowledge retention and skill development.
Summary
In conclusion, generative AI is transforming smart manufacturing and providing a new paradigm for optimizing production lines, reducing waste, and improving supply chain logistics. Companies that adopt this technology can benefit from increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved quality. However, the implementation of generative AI requires significant upfront investment, not the least of which is cultural.
To ensure success, companies should select the right hardware and software infrastructure, build a strong team, adhere to the four principles of digital transformation, become data companies, work collaboratively with vendors and competitors, and adhere to shared prosocial values.
Thanks for tuning in. Critical discourse is encouraged and welcomed. See you in the next article.
Follow me
› Linktree: https://linktr.ee/opensourceadvocate
› LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/enrimarini
› Substack: https://enrimarini.substack.com/
› Twitter: https://twitter.com/@RealEnriMarini
› Medium: https://medium.com/@TheEthicalEngineer
› YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@EthicsAndEngineering
› DEV Community: https://dev.to/@opensourceadvocate
› TikTok:https://www.tiktok.com/@opensourceadvocate
—
DISCLAIMER: I am not sponsored or influenced in any way, shape, or form by the companies and products mentioned. This is my own original content, with image credits given as appropriate and necessary.
Discover more from Coursity
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.