AWS Sagemaker vs AWS Bedrock, Just an AI Tool or more?

In today’s rapidly evolving AI landscape, the demands of modern Generative AI (GenAI) models have outpaced traditional training and deployment pipelines. This has necessitated robust, scalable, and user-friendly tools that simplify the development of GenAI models. Enter AWS Bedrock, Amazon’s latest foray into GenAI, and the well-established AWS Sagemaker. While both services aim to streamline AI development, they cater to different needs and audiences. Let’s dive into the details and see which service might be the catalyst for your next AI project.

AWS Bedrock

AWS Bedrock is Amazon’s fully managed service designed to simplify the integration and deployment of GenAI models. It boasts a selection of top-gen AI and foundational models, all accessible via a single API. This ease of use is a boon for developers who want to build secure, private, and responsible AI applications without delving into infrastructure management.

Pros:

• Simplified integration with a unified API
• Access to popular foundational models
• Focus on security and responsible AI principles

Cons:

• Less control over the underlying infrastructure
• Limited to the models provided by the platform

AWS Sagemaker

In contrast, AWS Sagemaker is a comprehensive machine learning service that supports a wide range of ML tasks, from computer vision to natural language processing. It offers an extensive suite of tools to build, train, deploy, and scale ML projects. While powerful, Sagemaker’s complexity can be daunting for new users.

Pros:

• Broad range of ML capabilities
• Web-based IDE for streamlined development
• Support for custom models and hyperparameter tuning

Cons:

• Steeper learning curve
• Requires more management of infrastructure

Technical Comparison

When it comes to performing GenAI tasks, AWS Bedrock and Sagemaker offer distinct advantages. Bedrock excels in ease of use with a focus on inference, while Sagemaker provides extensive customization and control.

Disclaimer: The pricing is just an estimate according to the official Amazon Pricing Pages, here and here.

Financial Comparison

Financially, both services operate on a pay-as-you-go model, but the pricing structures differ significantly. Here’s a comparison based on deploying the LLaMA 3 8B model with 1 million inferences.

AWS Sagemaker:

• Inference Costs: $3.825 per hour, totaling approximately $212 for 1 million inferences
• Storage Costs: $0.0023 per GB, totaling $23 for 1TB
• Total Estimated Cost: ~$236

AWS Bedrock:

• Input Tokens: $0.0003 per 1,000 tokens, totaling $15 for 50 million tokens
• Output Tokens: $0.0006 per 1,000 tokens, totaling $18 for 30 million tokens
• Total Estimated Cost: $33

Opinion:
AWS Bedrock’s token-based pricing model is advantageous for inference-heavy tasks, offering simplicity and lower costs. In contrast, AWS Sagemaker’s instance-based pricing provides more control over the entire ML pipeline but can be more expensive and complex.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between AWS Bedrock and AWS Sagemaker depends on your specific needs. For developers seeking a hassle-free, inference-focused platform, AWS Bedrock is the clear winner.

Its simplicity and lower cost make it ideal for those who want to avoid managing infrastructure. On the other hand, enterprises and advanced users who require extensive customization and broader ML capabilities will benefit from the comprehensive features of AWS Sagemaker.